Course Details

Course TitleResponse Style and Validity Assessment in Peace Officer Fitness-for-Duty Evaluations: Detecting Over- and Under-Reporting in a High-Stakes Context
Date Varies
ProviderMindset Continuing Education
Phone(916) 482-6463
Emailinfo@mindsetce.com
Website https://mindsetce.com/courses/response-style-and-validity-assessment-in-peace-officer-fitness-for-duty-evaluations-detecting-over-and-under-reporting-in-a-high-stakes-context
Locationonline
Credit Hours3
Instructor(s)Sepideh Souris, PsyD
Method of InstructionIndependent Learning
Approving AgencyAPA
Course Syllabus Course Outline Response Style.pdf

Course Description

This 3-hour program provides an in-depth examination of response style assessment and protocol validity within peace officer fitness-for-duty evaluations (FFDEs), with particular focus on the bidirectional incentive structures that distinguish FFDEs from clinical and preemployment contexts. Participants will develop a working command of MMPI-3 validity scales, their empirical foundations, and their configurational interpretation in adversarial, high-stakes settings. The program emphasizes the integration of validity findings with collateral data to produce defensible fitness opinions.

Course Objectives

<p style="caret-color: #0; border: 0px solid; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: calc(var(--spacing) * 4); margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: var(--text-xs); line-height: var(--tw-leading,var(--text-xs--line-height)); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">After completing this course, participants will be able to:

    <li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; --tw-space-y-reverse: 0; margin-block-start: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * var(--tw-space-y-reverse)); margin-block-end: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * calc(1 - var(--tw-space-y-reverse))); font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Identify the MMPI-3 validity scales associated with content non-responsiveness, over-reporting, and under-reporting, and distinguish the specific construct each scale is designed to detect<li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; --tw-space-y-reverse: 0; margin-block-start: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * var(--tw-space-y-reverse)); margin-block-end: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * calc(1 - var(--tw-space-y-reverse))); font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Describe the bidirectional incentive structure unique to fitness-for-duty evaluations and explain how it differs from the unidirectional incentive structure typical of preemployment psychological screening<li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; --tw-space-y-reverse: 0; margin-block-start: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * var(--tw-space-y-reverse)); margin-block-end: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * calc(1 - var(--tw-space-y-reverse))); font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Differentiate between content non-responsive invalidity and content-based invalidity in terms of their origins, implications, and appropriate evaluator responses when each is detected<li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; --tw-space-y-reverse: 0; margin-block-start: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * var(--tw-space-y-reverse)); margin-block-end: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * calc(1 - var(--tw-space-y-reverse))); font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Apply a configural interpretation strategy to MMPI-3 validity scale patterns in fitness-for-duty evaluation contexts, integrating scale elevations with referral context, behavioral observations, and collateral information to reach a defensible validity determination<li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Analyze the evidentiary limitations of substantive MMPI-3 scale scores obtained under conditions of invalid responding, and explain the implications of protocol invalidity for fitness-for-duty conclusions in contested administrative or legal proceedings