Course Details
Course Description
This program covers the basic science of how and why human judgments are susceptible to various kinds of bias, specifically emphasizing expert judgments in forensic settings. The program content focuses on bias and error reduction in forensic practice, supported by contemporary scholarship grounded in established research procedures.
These learnings should be applied in practice to improve expert forensic judgment and reduce bias and error. It would benefit society, justice, and the practitioners' reputation - those with good reputations and who do good work benefit in terms of job/promotion prospects, salary, and personal fulfillment. This program is uniquely valuable because it bridges cutting-edge science and practice to improve experts' judgments.
The program introduces a theoretical model clarifying when and why experts are protected against and when they are especially prone to bias. The implications of these findings for bias mitigation are discussed, as well as promising new directions for bias mitigation. The program is interactive, including experiential exercises and activities to demonstrate the topics described.
This program covers in detail empirical studies testing elements of the model, such as those bearing on the competing hypotheses of whether experts are vulnerable to bias vs. protected against bias by virtue of their expertise, how experts perceive themselves and their abilities, and the psychological mechanisms and real-world consequences of exaggerated confidence in objectivity. These studies are primarily done in the context of forensic judgment, forensic psychology, social work, and forensic science.
This program is intended for people in forensics in any work environment, at all career stages, including forensic psychologists, clinical psychologists, practitioners in forensic mental health and forensic science, and more broadly, scientists interested in expert judgment. "
Course Objectives
Describe 3 common biases that affect expert decision processes and explain ways in which they may compromise the validity and reliability of forensically-related judgments
Describe a theoretical model that clarifies when and why experts are protected against and when they are especially prone to bias
Describe practical bias mitigation strategies or steps to reduce bias in forensic work
Describe how strategies borrowed from open science, forensic science, and judgment and decision-making could be used to improve the rigor of and reduce bias in forensic judgments
Describe free high-quality resources for improving forensic practice