Skip to Main Content
CA.gov
Official website of the
State of California
Your POST ID:
Link Your POST ID
Your PASS Account
Sign Out
Translate
Translation Notice
State of California
POST
Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training
Menu
POST Search
Submit
Close
Sign In
Home
Hiring
Training
Certification
Decertification
Community
Laws & Policies
About Us
Hiring
Agency
Psychological Evaluators
cpeCourseDetail
Course Details
Course Title
Response Style and Validity Assessment in Peace Officer Fitness-for-Duty Evaluations: Detecting Over- and Under-Reporting in a High-Stakes Context
Date
Varies
Provider
Mindset Continuing Education
Phone
(916) 482-6463
Email
info@mindsetce.com
Website
https://mindsetce.com/courses/response-style-and-validity-assessment-in-peace-officer-fitness-for-duty-evaluations-detecting-over-and-under-reporting-in-a-high-stakes-context
Location
online
Credit Hours
3
Instructor(s)
Sepideh Souris, PsyD
Method of Instruction
Independent Learning
Approving Agency
APA
Course Syllabus
Course Outline Response Style.pdf
Course Description
This 3-hour program provides an in-depth examination of response style assessment and protocol validity within peace officer fitness-for-duty evaluations (FFDEs), with particular focus on the bidirectional incentive structures that distinguish FFDEs from clinical and preemployment contexts. Participants will develop a working command of MMPI-3 validity scales, their empirical foundations, and their configurational interpretation in adversarial, high-stakes settings. The program emphasizes the integration of validity findings with collateral data to produce defensible fitness opinions.
Course Objectives
<p style="caret-color: #0; border: 0px solid; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: calc(var(--spacing) * 4); margin-left: 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: var(--text-xs); line-height: var(--tw-leading,var(--text-xs--line-height)); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">After completing this course, participants will be able to:
<li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; --tw-space-y-reverse: 0; margin-block-start: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * var(--tw-space-y-reverse)); margin-block-end: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * calc(1 - var(--tw-space-y-reverse))); font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Identify the MMPI-3 validity scales associated with content non-responsiveness, over-reporting, and under-reporting, and distinguish the specific construct each scale is designed to detect<li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; --tw-space-y-reverse: 0; margin-block-start: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * var(--tw-space-y-reverse)); margin-block-end: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * calc(1 - var(--tw-space-y-reverse))); font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Describe the bidirectional incentive structure unique to fitness-for-duty evaluations and explain how it differs from the unidirectional incentive structure typical of preemployment psychological screening<li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; --tw-space-y-reverse: 0; margin-block-start: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * var(--tw-space-y-reverse)); margin-block-end: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * calc(1 - var(--tw-space-y-reverse))); font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Differentiate between content non-responsive invalidity and content-based invalidity in terms of their origins, implications, and appropriate evaluator responses when each is detected<li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; --tw-space-y-reverse: 0; margin-block-start: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * var(--tw-space-y-reverse)); margin-block-end: calc(calc(var(--spacing) * 2) * calc(1 - var(--tw-space-y-reverse))); font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Apply a configural interpretation strategy to MMPI-3 validity scale patterns in fitness-for-duty evaluation contexts, integrating scale elevations with referral context, behavioral observations, and collateral information to reach a defensible validity determination<li style="border: 0px solid; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-size: var(--text-sm); line-height: var(--leading-relaxed); --tw-leading: var(--leading-relaxed);">Analyze the evidentiary limitations of substantive MMPI-3 scale scores obtained under conditions of invalid responding, and explain the implications of protocol invalidity for fitness-for-duty conclusions in contested administrative or legal proceedings